The proposal, developed alongside Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and the Pembina Pipeline Corporation, would stretch from Bruderheim to the Roberts Bank terminal in British Columbia. While Smith frames the initiative as a strategy to reduce reliance on U.S. markets and ease separatist tensions ahead of an October referendum, environmental groups and opposition leaders have labeled the move a direct surrender to the fossil fuel industry. Critics argue the public-private partnership leaves taxpayers exposed to staggering financial risks while simultaneously undermining national climate commitments.
In section Newsroom
Carney Faces Backlash Over Multi-Billion Dollar Pipeline Expansion
As record-shattering heatwaves grip Canada, Prime Minister Mark Carney has ignited a firestorm of protest by partnering with Alberta to advance a massive new tar sands pipeline. The project, estimated to cost between $35 billion and $44 billion, aims to export over a million barrels of oil daily to Asian markets.
British Columbia Premier David Eby, despite his past opposition to such infrastructure, signaled he would not legally challenge the project, citing federal jurisdiction. This stance prompted sharp condemnation from the Wilderness Committee and NDP leader Avi Lewis, who described the agreement as a betrayal of public interest. With the country marking the five-year anniversary of the 2021 heat dome, activists contend that prioritizing pipeline expansion over renewable energy investment actively accelerates ecological decline and ignores the urgent need for climate-resilient infrastructure.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!