The admission surfaced in response to a lawsuit filed by California researchers challenging the termination of projects originally awarded under the Biden administration. While the Department of Energy had initially flagged over 600 grants for potential cancellation, the White House Office of Management and Budget ultimately executed 284 of those cuts. Every single one, with one exception, was located in a state represented by two Democratic-caucusing senators.
In section Newsroom
Trump Administration Admits Targeting Blue States for Grant Cuts
The U.S. Department of Energy has formally acknowledged in court filings that it canceled 284 clean energy grants based solely on the political leanings of the recipient states. Attorneys for the administration admitted that the cuts lacked any programmatic or performance-based justification, targeting regions that voted for Kamala Harris.
Legal experts and lawmakers have condemned the move as a blatant instance of political weaponization. Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) characterized the decision as an act of pure vindictiveness rather than fiscal policy, while political scientist Jennifer Victory suggested the maneuver represents a fundamental violation of the rule of law. The administration reportedly offered the admission to settle the litigation and avoid a broader discovery process that could have exposed more internal records regarding the distribution of federal aid.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!