In section Newsroom

Michigan Senate Race Turns Hostile as Establishment Targets El-Sayed

As Abdul El-Sayed surges to a double-digit lead in Michigan's U.S. Senate primary, establishment Democrats are pivoting from policy debates to sharp personal attacks. Critics argue the campaign against the former public health official is increasingly relying on xenophobic tropes to undermine his progressive platform.

Michigan Senate Race Turns Hostile as Establishment Targets El-Sayed

The latest survey from Emerson College Polling and WLNS/WOODTV places El-Sayed at 54% support, comfortably ahead of Representative Haley Stevens at 39%. This momentum arrives alongside roughly $60 million in spending from a super PAC affiliated with AIPAC, fueling a narrative that El-Sayed is unelectable. In response, Democratic allies of Stevens have characterized him as "sexist" and "un-American," claims that observers link to long-standing stereotypes regarding Muslim men.

Representative Hillary Scholten recently intensified these efforts, citing El-Sayed’s past association with commentator Hasan Piker to question his patriotism. Georgia state Representative Ruwa Romman dismissed such rhetoric as blatant racism, noting that these attacks mirror language used by Republican opponents. Anthropologist Nancy Khalil echoed this sentiment, suggesting the Democratic establishment is recycling centuries-old tropes to marginalize a candidate who centers his platform on Medicare for All and removing corporate influence from politics. Meanwhile, some party figures have refused to guarantee their support for El-Sayed should he win the August 4 primary, signaling a deepening rift within the Democratic ranks.

Share:on TelegramXFacebook

Subscribe to our newsletter

Once a week — the best stories from our editors, no ads or push notifications. Delivered Sunday morning.

Comments (0)

Leave a comment

No comments yet. Be the first!