Meta VP of Communications Andy Stone and Superintelligence Labs executive David Singleton have both refuted a report by Inc. columnist Jason Aten, who alleged the AI read his private messages despite Full Disk Access being disabled. According to Singleton, the Mac version of Muse relies on a rigorous, three-stage permission protocol integrated directly into the macOS system interface. He noted that even if a bug existed within the application, the underlying operating system protections prevent unauthorized access to message data.
In section Startups & Technology
Meta Defends Muse AI Amid Allegations of Unauthorized Data Access
Meta is pushing back against claims that its Muse AI agent accessed private user messages without explicit permission. The tech giant maintains that its Mac application requires a multi-step, user-initiated authorization process, asserting that its security architecture prevents the software from bypassing system-level protections to scrape personal communications.

Singleton explained that users must manually navigate macOS Settings to grant permission, a process that triggers a mandatory app restart. He dismissed the AI’s own explanation—that it was syncing device notifications—as a "hallucination" or incorrect output by the model. Despite these technical denials, skepticism remains high. The company recently faced a jury verdict in New Mexico confirming it misled users regarding data practices linked to the Cambridge Analytica scandal. While Meta currently holds a top spot on the App Store, the incident highlights a broader trust deficit. Adding to the friction, YouTuber Matt Robb recently reported a separate issue where Muse allegedly mishandled a Facebook Marketplace transaction, leading to the unauthorized disclosure of his home address. Meta has acknowledged this specific claim and is currently investigating the potential error.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!