The administration maintains that blocking specific journalists is lawful under the First Amendment, citing a compelling interest in maintaining professional standards and protecting national security. White House officials allege these outlets compromised sensitive information, pointing to reports on construction details for an East Wing bunker and intelligence regarding Iran. The president previously characterized the coverage provided by these organizations as fiction and lies.
In section Newsroom
White House labels press access a 'privilege' in legal battle
Government attorneys argued in a Tuesday court filing that press access to the White House is a privilege rather than a constitutional right, defending the administration’s decision to revoke credentials for reporters from CNN, MS NOW, and Politico ahead of an emergency judicial hearing scheduled for Wednesday.
The lawsuit, filed Monday by the affected news organizations, asserts that the ban constitutes viewpoint discrimination and violates due process. Legal analysts, including former US Attorney Joyce White Vance, warn that framing fundamental rights as government-granted privileges sets a dangerous precedent. US District Judge Timothy Kelly, who previously blocked an attempt to bar reporter Jim Acosta from the White House, will preside over the request for a temporary restraining order.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!